Legal Opinion

Coosaw Min. Co. v. Carolina Min. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina

Decided August 15, 1896PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Bills by the Coosaw Mining Company against the Carolina Mining Company and others, and against the Farmers’ Mining Company and others.

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONTON, Circuit Judge.

The Coosaw Mining Company obtained from the general assembly of South Carolina the exclusive right of digging, mining, and removing phosphate rock from the bed of Coosaw river, in that state. Soon after the passage of this act, the question was agitated whether this privilege and right so granted to the Coosaw Company was limited in duration, or whether it should continue in perpetuo, so long as certain prescribed conditions were complied with. James Conner. Esq., attorney general, in a formal report to the general assembly, stated forcibly this question, as one…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Insurance Company v. WeideSupreme Court of the United States · 1870

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Greenwood County v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  2. Harn v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Burningham v. BurkeUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Cannon v. MOTORS INS. CORP.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
  5. McCornick v. United States Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API