Legal Opinion

Davis v. Carnegie Steel Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 2, 1917No. 2983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio; John H. Clarke, Judge. Action by Frank B.. Davis and another against the Carnegie Steel Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.

Defendant in error (defendant below) had at its McDonald site, near Girard, Ohio, a large dump of furnace slag, amounting to many thousand tons and covering several acres; it had in connection with its Ohio steel plant, near Youngstown (a few *933miles from the McDonald site), another slag dump, much larger than the one at the latter site. Its daily dump oí slag from the Ohio plant alone was from 1,000 to 1,500 tons. Plaintiffs brought suit to recover damages for the breach of an alleged oral contract, whereby defendant, in consideration of plaintiffs’ agreement to remove…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anvil Mining Co. v. HumbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Lawrence v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
  3. Franklin v. Matoa Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  4. Magnolia Metal Co. v. GaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  5. Bristol Belt Line Railway Co. v. Bullock Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maloney v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  2. Depugh v. Mead Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Obear-Nester Glass Co. v. Lax & Shaw, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Wheeler v. BarnesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API