Legal Opinion
Boardman v. Martocchia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 8, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 663-63PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PINE, District Judge.
This is a motion to dismiss the action on three grounds, namely, lack of jurisdiction over defendants, improper venue, insufficiency of process and service of process.
The complaint discloses the following facts:
Plaintiff, a resident of Albany, New York, has filed suit in this Court against two defendants who are in the armed service stationed at the Marine Corps School at Quantico, Virginia. Plaintiff claims damages on account of an automobile accident occurring in the District of Columbia. Service of process on both defendants was effected under the Motor Vehicle Safety…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Olberding v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- King v. Wall & Beaver Street CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- State ex rel. Rush v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Western Urn Manufacturing Company and Farmer Brothers Company v. American Pipe and Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arlo Tatum, Central Committee for Conscientious Objectors v. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Vogel v. Tenneco Oil CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
- Arlo Tatum, Central Committee for Conscientious Objectors v. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971