Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Rush v. Circuit Court for Dane County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1932PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

It is urged on behalf of relator that sec. 85.05 (3), Stats., which provides for service of a summons on a non-resident causing personal injury while using our highways by delivering the summons to the secretary of state and taking the other steps by statute provided, does not authorize the commencement of an action by substituted service where both plaintiff and defendant are not residents of this state but reside elsewhere and in the same state. And further, that if this section be construed to authorize the commencement of an action when those facts are present, it results in a denial of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Blake v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. State ex rel. Cronkhite v. BeldenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Matthiesen v. MatthiesenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fine v. WenckeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Dart Transit Co., Inc. v. WigginsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  3. Welsh v. RuoppSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Alberts v. . AlbertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Hoagland v. DolanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API