Legal Opinion

Arlo Tatum, Central Committee for Conscientious Objectors v. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 27, 1971No. 24203_1PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKEY, Circuit Judge:

On 17 February 1970, appellants, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, filed suit challenging the legality of what appellants term “surveillance of lawful civilian political activity by the U.S. Army,” which appellees describe as “gathering by lawful means, * * * maintaining and using in their intelligence activities, any information relating to potential or actual civil disturbances [or] street demonstrations.” Appellants sought a declaratory judgment that the Army’s present conduct is unconstitutional or otherwise illegal, concomitantly an injunction…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Laird v. TatumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Harry Kenneth Clark v. Library of CongressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. Morton H. Halperin v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. Paton v. La PradeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  5. Julie Olden, Richard Hunter, Wilbur Bleau, and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lafarge Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API