Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Clark

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1992No. 90-2541PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

This case requires the interpretation of an insurance contract which provides that:

“In any uninsured motorists claim, we will jointly determine with the insured or his legal representative whether there is a legal right to recover damages, and if so in what amount. If agreement cannot be reached with regard to liability or amount of damages, the matter will be decided by arbitration. Any judgment against the uninsured of liability or amount of damages will be binding only if it was obtained with our written consent.”

This paragraph contains two separate parts that are at issue in this case:…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. MFA Mutual Ins. Co. v. BradshawSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  2. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. ShuffOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Motorists Mutual Insurance Companies v. HandlovicOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. NEWARK INSURANCE COMPANY v. EzellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1975
  5. Moorcroft v. First Insurance Co. of Hawaii, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Zirger v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. In re All Kelley & Ferraro Asbestos CasesOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Peterman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Furukawa v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  5. Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. HillCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API