United States v. Manuszak
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DITTER, District Judge.
The question presented in this case is whether probation may be revoked upon the basis of court-authorized wiretap evidence without first giving the probationer an opportunity to litigate the validity of the wiretap. Reluctantly, I conclude that it may not.
On January 30, 1974, respondent, Alfred Henry Manuszak, also known as “Sassy Doc,” plead guilty to operating an illegal gambling business in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1955. I imposed a fine of $4,000., suspended sentence of imprisonment, and placed Manuszak on probation for a period of three years upon the…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Thomas FredericksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. ForresterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. VestDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
- United States v. CantuDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1985
- United States v. Thomas Ralph FareseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.