Legal Opinion
United States v. Forrester
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 30, 2010No. 09-50029PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR.; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge HALL.
ORDER
The opinion filed on January 5, 2010, and published at 592 F.3d 972 (9th Cir. 2010), is hereby withdrawn, and a new opinion and partial dissent are filed concurrently herewith. Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc, filed January 15, 2010, is hereby rendered moot. The parties are permitted to file new petitions for rehearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40.
OPINION
MILAN D. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
DefendanL-Appellant Mark Stephen Forrester (Forrester) appeals…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Munoz-CamarenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Young v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Avgoustis v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- United States v. BattleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Nicholas LindseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.