Legal Opinion
In re Sandford
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico
Decided August 27, 2013No. 11-10-14424 TSPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAVID T. THUMA, Bankruptcy Judge.
The Debtor has asked the Court to modify her Third Amended Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization to give her until December 31, 2013 to sell her assets and pay creditors.1 Three secured creditors objected.2 *309This is a core matter. The Court has considered the briefs and supporting papers of the parties, has heard the testimony of witnesses at a final hearing, and has considered the arguments of counsel. Being sufficiently advised, the Court finds that the Motion is not well taken and should be denied.
I.FACTS
The Court finds the following facts:
1.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In the Matter of Ronald J. Witkowski, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- In the Matter of Russell E. Sinclair, Sr. And M. Marguerite Sinclair, Debtors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Williams v. First Nat. Bank of Pauls ValleySupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Barbosa v. SolomonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Meza v. Truman (In Re Meza)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re CampbellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- In re LoveyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2019
- Beard v. CreditorDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- In Re Dewitt L. Weary, III and Tamara T. WearyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 2025
- In re GardnerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.