Legal Opinion

People v. Kaplan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1931No. Docket No. 211, Calendar No. 35,714PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Appellant was convicted of. perjury in testifying before a Wayne county grand jury. The first question presented is:

“Can a grand jury continue to exercise its functions beyond the term in which it was organized, so as to return indictments in connection with matters not under consideration by it before the term of court is concluded?”

Defendant, being indicted for perjury, stood mute, and, before the jury was impaneled, raised the above question by motion to quash the indictment. He claims the answer should have been in the negative, and that the grand jury was without jurisdiction to conduct…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. TrineMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. State ex rel. Dunn v. NoyesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  3. O'Brien v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. People v. WernerMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. People v. MorganMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. DennisOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  2. People v. WeathersbyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People v. MinchellaMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. People v. CashMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. PoeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API