Legal Opinion

People v. Morgan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1903No. Docket No. 155PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Berrien; Coolidge, J. Orlando Morgan was convicted of violating the liquor law.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The sole question presented in this-case is whether an indictment returned by a grand jury which was summoned for and sworn at one term of court, and continued its work into the next, and was recognized by the court as a valid jury in receiving the indictment in question, should be vacated and set aside on the ground that the grand jury is functus officio at the end of the term for which it is chosen.

That the statute contemplates that the work of the grand jury will be done during the term to which it is summoned is apparent. 3 Comp. Laws, § 11885. Does it follow that, when the jury has in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Dunn v. NoyesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  2. People v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. People v. ReigelMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. BrautiganIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  2. People v. WeathersbyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People v. McCauleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  4. People v. LayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Flynn v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API