Legal Opinion
North Coast Electric Company v. Safari Electric LLC
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided August 27, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00763Unknown
1Opinion
1 HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 THE UNITED STATES FOR THE USE OF 10 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY, Case No. 2:19-cv-00763-RAJ Plaintiff, 11 ORDER v. 12 13 SAFARI ELECTRIC, LLC, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the Court are two motions. Having considered the submissions of the 17 parties, the relevant portions of the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that 18 oral argument is unnecessary. For the reasons below, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or 19 in the Alternative, to Stay…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.