Legal Opinion

Pathfinder Communications Corp. v. MacY

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 2003No. 02A04-0303-CV-146PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATHIAS, Judge.

Pathfinder Communications Corporation ("WOWO") filed a motion for preliminary injunction and a complaint requesting a temporary restraining order, preliminary and permanent injunctions, and damages against its former employee, Dave Macy ("Macy"),1 in Allien Superior Court alleging that Macy violated a covenant not to compete by obtaining employment at a competing radio station. After a hearing was held on WOWO's motion for preliminary injunction, the trial court found that WOWO did not have a legitimate protecti-ble interest in Macy or his radio program "Macy in the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Norlund v. FaustIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Richmond Brothers v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  4. Indiana Family and Social Services Administration v. Walgreen Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Barlow v. SipesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Central Indiana Podiatry, P.C. v. KruegerIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Coates v. Heat Wagons, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Gleeson v. Preferred Sourcing, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Clark's Sales and Service, Inc v. John D. Smith and Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. MacGill v. ReidIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API