Legal Opinion
Barlow v. Sipes
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 31, 2001No. 47A01-0006-CV-212PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBB, Judge.
Bill Barlow and his wife Rachel Barlow (the "Barlows") appeal the trial court's grant of a preliminary injunction in favor of Dexter Sipes, Dan Sipes, and Sipes Body and Glass, Inc. (collectively referred to as "Sipes Body"). We affirm and remand.
Issue
The Barlows raise the following restated issues for our review:
1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting the preliminary injunction in favor of Sipes Body because an adequate legal remedy, that is a suit for money damages, was available;
2. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- City of Gary Ex Rel. King v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Gleeson v. Preferred Sourcing, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Robert's Hair Designers, Inc. v. PearsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Aberdeen Apartments v. Cary Campbell Realty Alliance, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. CoeOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.