Legal Opinion

Central Indiana Podiatry, P.C. v. Krueger

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 2008No. 29S05-0706-CV-256PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

We hold that noncompetition agreements between a physician and a medical practice group are not per se void as against public policy and are enforceable to the extent they are reasonable. To be geographically reasonable, the agreement may restrict only that area in which the physician developed patient relationships using the practice group’s resources.

Facts and Procedural History

From 1996 until 2005, podiatrist Kenneth Krueger was employed by Central Indiana Podiatry, P.C. (CIP) under a series of written employment agreements that were renewed every one or two years. Each…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mohanty v. St. John Heart Clinic, S.C.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Raymundo v. Hammond Clinic Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Donahue v. Permacel Tape Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Licocci v. Cardinal Associates, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Norlund v. FaustIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Coates v. Heat Wagons, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Mosley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Gleeson v. Preferred Sourcing, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Clark's Sales and Service, Inc v. John D. Smith and Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Roberts v. Community Hospitals of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2008

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API