Saxby v. Cadigen
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
Question 6 of the special verdict reads
as follows: “Did the defendant Gilbert C. Klokow fail to exercise the skill and judgment he possessed in the management and control of his car?” The jury answered this question “No.”
The appellant first complains of the following instruction given by the court in connection with that question:
“The mere fact that an accident happened creates no presumption of negligence of anybody. Therefore, the burden of proof to establish negligence, or any other essential fact in this case, rests upon the one who asserts or claims such fact to be true, and who asserts…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Haugen v. WittkopfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Wheeler v. Rural Mutual Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
3Cited by8 opinions
- Heagney v. SellenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Ronald J. Dakter v. Dale L. CavallinoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Topel v. CorrezWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Severson v. HauckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Heagney v. SellenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.