Legal Opinion

Oliver v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 2006No. 20050090PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEHRING, Justice:

1 1 When he pleaded guilty to the murder of his wife, Gary Oliver disclosed to the sentencing court that he had taken some pills to help him sleep and cope with depression. He insisted, however, that he understood the meaning and consequences of his guilty plea. He later changed his mind and claimed that the medicine he had taken made him incapable of entering a knowing and voluntary plea and that he should be permitted to withdraw it. The sentencing court and the court of appeals rejected Mr. Oliver's claims.

T2 We granted certiorari to determine whether the sentencing court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Gary MalcolmCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  2. State v. VisserUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. United States v. Savinon-AcostaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  4. Jesus Miranda-Gonzalez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  5. State v. BecksteadUtah Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. KauliaHawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Arriaga v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. ArchuletaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  4. Rhinehart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  5. State v. CiccolelliCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API