Legal Opinion

State v. Beckstead

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 2006No. 20041023PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEHRING, Justice:

¶ 1 In this case, we define the scope of a sentencing judge’s duty to assure himself that a defendant’s guilty plea is knowing and voluntary when the judge discovers that the defendant has been drinking before appearing to enter his plea. We conclude that a sentencing judge has substantial latitude in selecting the method he uses to supplement the elements of a plea colloquy as required by rule 11 of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure in order to assure that a plea is knowing and voluntary. We expressly decline to mandate the use of particular questions or procedures by a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Cole, Reginald. Appeal of Reginald ColeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. Key Design Inc. v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. VisserUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. BenvenutoUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. HittleUtah Supreme Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. OttUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. Damien A. CandlandUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. LovellUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Oliver v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. ArchuletaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API