State v. Beckstead
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEHRING, Justice:
¶ 1 In this case, we define the scope of a sentencing judge’s duty to assure himself that a defendant’s guilty plea is knowing and voluntary when the judge discovers that the defendant has been drinking before appearing to enter his plea. We conclude that a sentencing judge has substantial latitude in selecting the method he uses to supplement the elements of a plea colloquy as required by rule 11 of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure in order to assure that a plea is knowing and voluntary. We expressly decline to mandate the use of particular questions or procedures by a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Cole, Reginald. Appeal of Reginald ColeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Key Design Inc. v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. VisserUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BenvenutoUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HittleUtah Supreme Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. OttUtah Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Damien A. CandlandUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. LovellUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Oliver v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. ArchuletaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.