Grier v. Fox
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Charles Circuit Court. cited Peery v. Harper, 42 Mo. 131; Braclcett v. Brackett, 53 Mo. 265. cited: Brackett v. Brackett, 53 Mo. 265 ; Jones v. Snodgrass, 54 Mo. 597 ; Davis v. Perry, 46 Mo. 449 ; Anderson v. Moberly, 46 Mo.. 191.
1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.
This action was commenced by attachment under the Landlord and Tenant’s Act. The suit is on two notes, neither ■of which were due at the commencement of the action, but which had both matured at the date of the return of the ■summons. The issue on the plea in abatement was found for defendant. Defendant then moved to dismiss, on the ground that the suit was commenced before the maturity ■of the claim. The motion was overruled, and such proceedings subsequently had that judgment was entered for plaintiff.
The record presents only one question for determination: *523Whether, where a suit is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Peery v. HarperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
- Brackett v. BrackettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pierce v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Duryee v. TurnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
- National Tube Works Co. v. Ring Refrigerating & Ice Machine Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Augir v. ForesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Houser v. AnderschMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.