Legal Opinion

Voorhis v. Michaelis

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1891PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from Russell JDistriet Gourt. The opinion, filed January 10, 1891, states the case.

1Per curiam

This was an action brought by Voorhis, Miller & Rupel against G. J. Michaelis on a promissory note for $456, not due. An order of attachment was granted and issued by the probate judge of the county where the action was commenced, and thereon the property of G. J. Michaelis was taken possession of by the officer. A motion to dissolve the attachment was made by Michaelis. The testimony was partly oral and partly by affidavits — mostly oral. The motion to dissolve was sustained and the case dismissed. The plaintiffs excepted and bring the case here.

The evidence is conflicting, and against the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dodd v. Hills & KramerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  2. Sheppard v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Pierce v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Toler v. SatterthwaiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Dayton Spice-Mills Co. v. SloanNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. O'Leary v. RoeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Cahill-Swift Mfg. Co. v. SayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. E. W. Smith Lumber Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API