Legal Opinion

Halvorson v. Dahl

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1978No. 44492PublishedCited by 168 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

Appellant challenges the dismissal of her complaint against respondent City of Seattle. She is the widow of a man who died in a fire in a Seattle hotel in May 1976. Defendants Dahl owned the hotel. Appellant also joined respondent City as a defendant, based on the alleged failure of city officials to enforce the building, housing, and safety codes and the alleged connection between that failure and the fire. After the filing of appellant's complaint, respondent City moved for dismissal under CR 12(b)(6), and the motion was granted. We reverse the trial court and conclude plaintiff's complaint…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Grimsby v. SamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Adams v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Motyka v. City of AmsterdamNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Brown v. MacPherson's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by168 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Class v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Irwin v. Town of WareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Taylor v. Stevens CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1988

163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API