Legal Opinion

Cannelongo v. Fidelity America Small Business Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 18, 1988PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice:

This is an appeal from a decision of the Superior Court granting judgment in favor of a mortgagee for a deficiency arising out of a mortgage foreclosure. The mortgagor-appellant contends that the Superior Court erred in permitting pre-judgment seizure of appellant’s real property, not the subject of the mortgage foreclosure, pursuant to a writ of lis pendens and in ruling that appellee’s deficiency claim was not barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We agree that lis pendens was not an authorized writ in this proceeding but affirm the Superior Court’s ruling on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilgus v. Salt Pond Investment Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1985
  2. McCahill v. RobertsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. City of Wilmington v. SpencerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  4. Dorsch v. JenkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. LaBounty v. LaBountySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Standard Distributing Co. Ex Rel. Pennsylvania Manufacturer's Ass'n v. NallySupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  2. USH Ventures v. Global Telesystems Group, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2000
  3. Soliman v. Spencer (In Re Spencer)District Court, D. Delaware · 1990
  4. Alexander v. CahillSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  5. DiSabatino v. SaliceteSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API