Legal Opinion

McCahill v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1966No. Appeal, 95PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Eagen,

The plaintiffs-appellant alleging ownership of a certain building situated on land owned by the defendants, 1 instituted this action in equity seeking: (1) to have their title to the building judicially declared; (2) to enjoin any sale of the real estate in question which could prejudice their rights; and, (3) to obtain other relief deemed to be appropriate. To the complaint were affixed, as exhibits, copies of letters writ ten by tbe plaintiffs to tbe defendants. As indicated by tbis correspondence, plaintiffs at first demanded the value of the building in cash.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Posternack v. Am. Cas. Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Dice v. BenderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. John Deere Plow Co. v. HersheySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Mitchell v. RandalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Diamond v. Lawrence CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. GOLDMAN v. McShainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Chorba v. Davlisa Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Barak, G. v. Karolizki, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. White v. WensauerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API