Legal Opinion
In Re Sandground
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 31, 1988No. 86-1699PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary matter, the Hearing Committee found that Mark B. Sandground had violated DR 1-102(A)(4), 1 (5), 2 and DR 7-102(A)(7) 3 by assisting his client in concealing information about the client’s funds with respect to discovery requests in a pending divorce suit. The Committee recommended a sanction of public censure. The Board on Professional Responsibility agreed with the findings that these disciplinary rules had been violated, but recommended that Sandground be suspended from the practice of law for ninety days. 4 Before this court Sandground contends that the Board erred in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Matter of SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re RosenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re HallmarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re AbramsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re HopkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.