Legal Opinion

Secco, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 2005PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge FLAHERTY.

Secco, Inc. and the PMA Insurance Group (Employer) petitions for review from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed in part and reversed in part the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ). The decision of the WCJ granted the reinstatement petition of John Work (Claimant) but only for a limited time. As to the duration of the benefits, the Board reversed determining that Claimant was entitled to ongoing benefits. We affirm.

Claimant worked as an electrician for Employer. Claimant sustained a work-related injury to his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burrell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Allegis Group v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Melmark Home v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Rosenberg)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Bentley v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. County of Bucks v. WCAB (LePosa)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Day v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Day v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API