Secco, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge FLAHERTY.
Secco, Inc. and the PMA Insurance Group (Employer) petitions for review from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed in part and reversed in part the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ). The decision of the WCJ granted the reinstatement petition of John Work (Claimant) but only for a limited time. As to the duration of the benefits, the Board reversed determining that Claimant was entitled to ongoing benefits. We affirm.
Claimant worked as an electrician for Employer. Claimant sustained a work-related injury to his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Burrell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Allegis Group v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
3Cited by6 opinions
- Melmark Home v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Rosenberg)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Bentley v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- County of Bucks v. WCAB (LePosa)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Day v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Day v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.