Day v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurrence
CONCURRING OPINION BY
Judge McCullough.
I agree with the Majority that the evidence supports the WCJ’s determination that the employer met its burden of proof in this suspension proceeding. However, I would employ a different analysis to reach this conclusion.
First, I believe our courts must clarify the fundamental question of when a claimant on total disability status has a duty to look for work. This Court’s recent decisions indicate that accepting a pension is the event that triggers a claimant’s obligation to seek employment, and with this I disagree, particularly because this analysis…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Landmark Constructors, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Costello)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Dugan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- South Hills Health System v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.