Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Day v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 2010Published

1Concurrence

CONCURRING OPINION BY

Judge McCullough.

I agree with the Majority that the evidence supports the WCJ’s determination that the employer met its burden of proof in this suspension proceeding. However, I would employ a different analysis to reach this conclusion.

First, I believe our courts must clarify the fundamental question of when a claimant on total disability status has a duty to look for work. This Court’s recent decisions indicate that accepting a pension is the event that triggers a claimant’s obligation to seek employment, and with this I disagree, particularly because this analysis…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Landmark Constructors, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Costello)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Dugan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. South Hills Health System v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API