Melmark Home v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Rosenberg)
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge LEAVITT.*
Melmark Home (Employer) petitions for review of an adjudication of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) to dismiss Employer’s modification petition. In this *160appeal, we consider whether the WCJ and the Board erred in concluding that an employer is required by the Workers’ Compensation Act1 (Act) to issue a Notice of Ability to Return to Work form within thirty days of receiving medical evidence that the claimant is capable of performing some work.
Joan Rosenberg (Claimant) worked for Employer…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Hilyer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Amendola v. Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Summit Trailer Sales v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Macomber v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kleinhagan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Phoenixville Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Bentley v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Miegoc v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.