Legal Opinion

Novelty Import Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 21, 1964No. 68780; protest 59/33338 (New York)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

In this case, the protest of plaintiff is directed against the action of the collector of customs in classifying certain wire poodle dogs as manufactures of rayon or other synthetic textile under the provisions of paragraph 1312 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. *275Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, and assessing duty thereon at the rate of 25 cents per pound and 31% per centum ad valorem.

The merchandise is claimed to be properly subject to classification as other toys, not specially…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pacific Guano & Fertilizer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railway Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kobata v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. Rainin Instrument Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
  3. Artmark Chicago, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  4. Davies, Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  5. House of Ideas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API