Rosetti v. Land Reclamation

DANA, Justice.

[¶ 1] W.H. Shurtleff Co. appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board on a motion brought by Land Reclamation, the second employer in a successive injury ease, ordering Shurtleff to reimburse Reclamation for fifty percent of Reclamation’s obligation to pay continuing benefits to the employee pending appeal. 39-A M.R.S.A. § 205(9)(B)(2) (Supp.1996). Because we conclude that the Board has no authority to determine apportionment issues between insurers, we vacate the Board’s decision. 1 39-A M.R.S.A. § 354 (Supp.1996).

[¶2] The employee, Dominic Rosetti, suffered two…