Legal Opinion
Sreda v. Kessel
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 15, 1942PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtField, C.J.
This action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries was heard in the Superior Court by a judge sitting without a jury. A bill of exceptions allowed by the trial judge has been entered in this court.
The evidence consisted of the report of an auditor and testimony of the plaintiff. The defendants filed requests for rulings, but the bill of exceptions does not show the disposition thereof by the trial judge or any exception by the defendants relating to these requests. The judge filed a finding, in which he stated that he found for certain named defendants, and for the plaintiff…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Reid v. DohertyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Adamaitis v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Leshefsky v. American EmPloyers' InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Cameron v. BuckleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Stowell v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Perry v. HanoverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- In re LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Barton v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- James B. Rendle Co. v. Conley & Daggett, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.