Legal Opinion
Cassidy v. Kraft-Phenix Cheese Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1938No. Docket No. 68, Calendar No. 39,547PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
Leave having been granted, plaintiff has appealed from an order of the circuit judge dismissing plaintiff’s amended declaration in part. Defendant has taken a cross-appeal, claiming that the court should have dismissed the declaration in toto.
The declaration contains three counts. The circuit judge dismissed the first count and paragraph four of the third count. The first count is for breach of an alleged oral agreement entered into on the 13th day of November, 1935, in the city of New York. It is alleged that the defendant, a Delaware corporation, orally agreed to grant to plaintiff the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dung v. . ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Dawe v. MorrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Levy v. . BrushNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Adolph v. Cookware Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Cagger v. . LansingNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Barclae v. ZarbMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Beckie Price v. High Pointe Oil Co IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
- Ensink v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Sutter v. BiggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.