Legal Opinion
State v. Tuck
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 26, 2001No. C.A. No. 3186-MPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Whitmore, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Nathan G. Tuck has appealed a decision of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas which denied his motion to suppress all of the state’s evidence against him. This court affirms.
I
{¶ 2} During 1996, appellant was indicted on two counts of drug trafficking in violation of R.C. 2925.03(A)(1) and (5). 1 A warrant was issued for his arrest and appellant fled to Canada, where he was born and has since maintained citizenship. The state began extradition proceedings. While the extradition process was pending, appellant attempted to enter the United States…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Breard v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Harvey E. Page (99-5361) Thomas Andre Powers (99-5449) Keith Linton (99-5451) David Shawn Hill (99-5456)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Chucks EmuegbunamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Jose Lombera-CamorlingaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. VasquezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- State v. HaywoodOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. Irby, Unpublished Decision (11-1-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. Brown, 23637 (6-4-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. JenkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.