Legal Opinion

Escamilla v. Vannucci

California Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2025No. S282866Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA DANIEL ESCAMILLA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JOHN VANNUCCI, Defendant and Respondent. S282866 First Appellate District, Division One A166176 Alameda County Superior Court RG21111193 March 20, 2025 Justice Corrigan authored the opinion of the Court, in which Justice Guerrero and Justices Liu, Kruger, Groban, Jenkins, and Evans concurred. ESCAMILLA v. VANNUCCI S282866 Opinion of the Court by Corrigan, J. Code of Civil Procedure section 335.11 sets out a two-year statute of limitations for a variety of tort suits, including malicious prosecution. However,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API