Legal Opinion

Veazie v. Dwinel

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1862PublishedCited by 11 opinions

These cases were submitted upon the printed volume of testimony, to the full Court, who, by an agreement of the parties, were authorized to render such judgment, orders, or decrees, in the respective actions, as the legal rights of the parties require. In the matter of damages, the Coui’t were to decide upon the amount, if any, which shall be rendered in each case upon the evidence legally admissible in such cases.

Read the full summary

These cases were submitted upon the printed volume of testimony, to the full Court, who, by an agreement of the parties, were authorized to render such judgment, orders, or decrees, in the respective actions, as the legal rights of the parties require. In the matter of damages, the Coui’t were to decide upon the amount, if any, which shall be rendered in each case upon the evidence legally admissible in such cases. The cases were submitted upon very elaborate printed arguments, answers and replies, by

1Opinion of the Court

The facts sufficiently appear from the opinion of the Court, which was drawn up by

Rice, J.

These cases come before the Court on full reports of evidence. They all refer'to the same subject matter, and the evidence submitted and the facts, admitted or proved, apply with slight exceptions to all. Though the evidence reported is very voluminous, the facts, on which ■the rights of the parties depend, are neither numerous nor complicated. As a foundation for the application of legal principles pertinent to the issues presented, we state the controlling facts established by the evidence reported. -…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. CunninghamCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  2. Mills v. HallNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  3. Trustees of the First Baptist Church v. Utica & Schenectady RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Turpin v. RemyIndiana Supreme Court · 1833
  5. Gates v. BlincoeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1834

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. Gold Run Ditch & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Thornton v. DowWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Nolan v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  4. Collinson v. John L. Scott, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. Dumont v. SpeersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API