Legal Opinion

Dumont v. Speers

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 22, 1968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARDEN, Justice.

On appeal. Under the provisions of 12 M.R.S.A. § 2201 1 appellants addressed a petition to the Commissioner of Inland Fisheries & Game (Commissioner), seeking the installation of a fishway in the dam across the Kennebec River at Augusta serving the Bates Manufacturing Company. The Commissioner assigned the matter for hearing on February 10, 1967. It may be concluded that the Commissioner made no immediate decision on the petition, and by pleading entitled “Complaint in Review of the Administrative Action” dated August 21, 1967, appellants sought, in the nature of a Petition…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SissonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
  3. Commissioner of Natural Resources v. S. Volpe & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. Payne Butler v. Providence Gas CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1910
  5. Rogers v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  2. Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Judicial CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API