Legal Opinion

Gates v. Blincoe

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 1, 1834PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Circuit Court for Hancock Countv.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson

delivered the Opinion of the Court.,The plaintiff sued the defendants, in case, for diverting) the water from his mill, by cutting a ditch. They at- > tempted to justify, on the ground that the mill dam was i a nuisance, which they had a legal right to abate.,

On the trial, the court instructed the jury that — “ if the water occasioned [by the dam] was a nuisance, or had been a nuisance, and was like to become so again, the defendants had a right to cut a ditch, and draw off' the water,” and thereupon the jury found a verdict for the defendants, on which the court rendered a judgment in bar of…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ehrlick v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Harrower v. RitsonNew York Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Humphreys Oil Co. v. LilesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Veazie v. DwinelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1862
  5. King v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API