Legal Opinion
BankWest, N.A. v. Groseclose
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 2, 1995No. 18899, 18900PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
Mary Groseclose (Groseclose) appeals summary judgments granted to BankWest, Sandra Garrett (S. Garrett), and Jerome Zebro-ski (Zebroski) (collectively referred to as Buyers) in actions filed in Sully and Hughes Counties. We agree with the trial court in both cases that no genuine issue of material fact exists and, therefore, Buyers are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We affirm.
FACTS
The issues of these consolidated appeals arise out of a contract for deed executed on 1,440 acres of property in Sully County, South Dakota. In 1981, Ward (now deceased) and Mary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Waddell v. Dewey County BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Peterson v. La CroixSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Ford v. HoferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- Hofer v. WM Scott Livestock CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Stockmen's Livestock Market, Inc. v. Norwest Bank of Sioux City, Na, Stockmen's Livestock Market, Inc. v. Norwest Bank of Sioux City, NaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Petersen v. DacySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Thunderstik Lodge, Inc. v. ReuerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Bozied v. City of BrookingsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Continental Grain Co. v. Heritage BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.