Legal Opinion
Peterson v. La Croix
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 24, 1988No. 15654PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, Justice.
Doug Peterson and Teresa Peterson (Pe-tersons), plaintiffs and appellants, appeal from an order vacating judgment against Robbyn LaCroix Wilson (Wilson), defendant and appellee. We reverse and remand.
Petersons commenced an action against Wilson and other defendants for breach of express warranty, fraud, and negligence arising out of the purchase by Petersons of Wilson’s Sioux Falls residence. Wilson was personally served with a summons and complaint at her home in Ottawa, Canada. All other defendants were either dismissed from the suit or settled prior to trial. Wilson…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. A & P Steel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Haggar v. OlfertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- National Surety Corporation v. ShoemakerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- Martin v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Eby v. MisarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Hrachovec v. KaarupSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Clarke v. ClarkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- BankWest, N.A. v. GrosecloseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- SUNWEST BK. OF ALBUQUERQUE v. RoderiguezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Upper Plains Contracting Inc. v. Pepsi AmericasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.