Continental Grain Co. v. Heritage Bank
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSabers, Justice
[¶ 1] Shasta Livestock Auction Yard, Inc. (Shasta) and Heritage Bank appeal a summary judgment in favor of Continental Grain Company. We reverse and remand because genuine issues of material fact exist.
FACTS
[¶ 2] This is a consolidation by the trial court of three lawsuits brought by Continental, Heritage Bank, and Shasta. The following appear to be the facts based on the present record and the briefs.
[¶ 3] Bud Brandenburg is a cattle order buyer. His purchases were financed by Louis Welte, through Heritage Bank.1 Welte authorized Bud to sign checks on Welte’s account. In the normal course of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State, Department of Revenue v. ThiewesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Waddell v. Dewey County BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Koeniguer v. EckrichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Matter of Estate of ElliottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- BankWest, N.A. v. GrosecloseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hamilton v. SommersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Discover Bank v. StanleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Estate of KlauzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Stern Oil Co. v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Zochert v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.