Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Permutit Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 30, 1943No. 8010PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Circuit Judge.

This appeal grows out of a suit under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, for the issuance of a patent.

The alleged invention in controversy is a discoid lift-turn valve composed of plate-like rotor and stator members, each having a corresponding plurality of ports which are selectively brought into registry by the rotation of the movable member. Thereby the flow of different liquids through the *824valve may be successively established. For the prevention of leakage from one port to a non-corresponding port while the valve is in operation, a disc-shaped resilient gasket is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Smith v. Carter Carburetor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Gold v. GoldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916
  4. Lorenz v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  5. Downs v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Etten v. Lovell Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Johnson & Johnson v. Kendall Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1963
  3. S. W. Farber, Inc. v. Texas Instruments, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
  4. Hansen v. ColliverDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1959
  5. SEALECTRO CORPORATION v. LVC Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API