Legal Opinion

Downs v. Andrews

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 5, 1928No. 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Acting Associate Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, awarding in an interference proceeding priority of invention to the junior party, Chester E. Andrews, thereby, affirming the decision of the Examiners in Chief, affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences.

The subject-matter of the interference is defined in four counts which are as follows:(1) “A catalytic body comprising a base of aluminum and a metal oxide catalyst on said aluminum and. in direct contact therewith.” '(2) “In a converter the combination with a catalyst, comprising…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Hide & Leather Splitting & Dressing Mach. Co. v. American Tool & Mach. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1870

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wire Tie MacH. Co. v. Pacific Box CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  2. Boucher Inventions, Ltd. v. Sola Electric Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1942
  3. Daniels v. Permutit Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  4. Johnson & Johnson v. Kendall Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1963
  5. Diamond v. WoodyardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API