Legal Opinion
Holliday Amusement Co. v. South Carolina
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 3, 2007No. 06-1668PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge KING joined.
OPINION
WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs Warren P. Holliday and Holli-day Amusement Company of Charleston, Inc. (“Holliday”), seek just compensation for an alleged regulatory taking. Holliday claims that 1999 S.C. Act No. 125, which outlawed video gaming machines in the state of South Carolina, destroyed Holli- day’s business and thus effected an unconstitutional taking of his property without just compensation. Holliday brought suit in federal district court, and the court granted…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Roc Sansotta v. Town of Nags HeadCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Weigel v. MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Severance v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Alto Eldorado Partnership v. County of Santa FeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Peters v. Village of CliftonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.