Legal Opinion
Cuiffo v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 1, 1955No. 199-54PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WHITAKER, Judge.
Plaintiff was employed as a blocker and bracer at the New York Port of Embarkation, Brooklyn, New York, at an hourly wage of $1.67 for daytime work, and $1.83 an hour for night-time work. He was discharged, effective September 30, 1952, but was restored to duty on August 3, 1953. He sues for his pay in the meantime.
Defendant defends on the sole ground that plaintiff has not exhausted his administrative remedy.
Plaintiff was discharged because he took from the premises for his own use some lumber that had apparently been discarded.
Since this case is before us on motions for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. Abilene & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Prendergast v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Grover v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- William B. Ogden v. Eugene M. Zuckert, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Power v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Albert Piccone v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.