Legal Opinion

Girault v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 8, 1955No. 50474PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITAKER, Judge.

In our opinion filed April 5, 1955 in this case we held, 130 F.Supp. 343, that two documents, called to the attention of the Secretary of War after he had held that plaintiff was entitled to receive retired pay because incapacitated for active service, which incapacity he had held was an incident of his military service — we held that these two documents constituted newly discovered evidence, which authorized the Secretary of War to reopen the case. We further held that his decision reversing his prior decision was not arbitrary, and, hence, was binding on us.

After plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dismuke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Silberschein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Garfield v. United States Ex Rel. GoldsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Cuiffo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  5. Carlin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. William B. Ogden v. Eugene M. Zuckert, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  3. Furlong v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  4. Frank E. Lipp v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  5. Lipp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API