Legal Opinion

Brunell Leasing Corporation v. Wilkins

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 22, 1969No. 1 CA-CIV 948PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUCKER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Brunell Leasing Corporation, instituted a suit against Nettie Wilkins, as Executrix of the Estate of Berne W. Wilkins, deceased, for overdue rentals under a lease, and individually on a guaranty signed by Berne Wilkins to which it was alleged he forged the signature of his wife, Nettie Wilkins. Mrs. Wilkins’ motion for summary judgment was granted, hence this appeal.

Construing the facts in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion, namely the plaintiff, they are as follows. Brunell Leasing Corporation and Berne Wilkins entered into a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Estate of DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Stevens v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  4. New York Merchandise Co. v. StoutWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Rice v. TiltonWyoming Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. William B. Tanner Co. v. Estate of FesslerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Williams v. GrossmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Estate of Busch v. Ferrell-Duncan Clinic, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  4. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  5. Mervyn's, Inc. v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API