Mervyn's, Inc. v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GORDON, Vice Chief Justice:
Petitioner brings this special action challenging the order of the respondent trial judge denying its motion for judgment against garnishee-defendant. We accepted jurisdiction under Ariz. Const. art. 6 § 5 because petitioner has no equally plain, speedy, and adequate remedy by appeal. One issue is presented: where a joint bank account is being subjected to garnishment based on a judgment against only one of the joint owners, must the other non-debtor joint owner who is joined in the garnishment proceeding pursuant to A.R.S. § 12- 1595(C) be notified of his joinder…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re the Rights Ex Rel. Gila RiverArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Jackson v. Phoenixflight Productions, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Master Financial, Inc. v. WoodburnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Roberts v. RobertCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. One Single Family Residence At 1810 East Second AvenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.