Legal Opinion

City of Greenwood v. Provine

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1926No. 25533PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPIolden, P. J.

This is'a mandamus suit against the mayor and commissioners of the city of Greenwood to compel them to furnish water from the waterworks system of the municipality, for the use of appellee, B. B. Provine, at his residence on Grand Boulevard, and to extend the water mains of the city into Boulevard Addition, so that a water connection may be made from the waterworks system to his residence.

The petition for the writ of mandamus alleges that appellee, Provine, is a resident citizen of said city and resides on his lot, No. 1 in block 33 in what is known as the “Boulevard Addition” to said city;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lukrawka v. Spring Valley Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Lawrence v. RichardsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913
  3. Robinson v. Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Reid Development Corp. v. Township of Parsippany-Troy HillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  2. Crownhill Homes, Inc. v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Town of Wickenburg v. SabinArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Reid Dev. Corp. v. Parsippany-Troy Hills Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  5. Board of Supervisors v. Mississippi State Highway CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1949

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API