Banberry Development Corp. v. South Jordan City
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OAKS, Justice:
This is a suit by three subdividers against a city to challenge the validity of water connection and park improvement fees imposed as a condition to connection to the city water main and as a condition to final approval of the subdividers' plat. At issue in this appeal are the legality of any such fees, and, if they are legal, the criteria for judging their reasonableness.
The procedure for charging the park improvement fee does not appear in the record. City Ordinance 13-1-5, which the sub-dividers concede was lawfully enacted and constitutional, requires a subdivider who…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Airwick Industries, Inc. v. Carlstadt Sewerage AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Deerfield Estates, Inc. v. Township of East BrunswickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Call v. City of West JordanUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- West Park Ave., Inc. v. Township of OceanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- Call v. City of West JordanUtah Supreme Court · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- City of College Station v. Turtle Rock Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Wells v. Children's Aid Soc. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Price Development Co., LP v. Orem CityUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. C.I. Mitchell & Best Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Home Builders Ass'n v. City of BeavercreekOhio Supreme Court · 2000
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.