Legal Opinion

Sears Logistic Services v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Sears Logistic Services (Employer) petitions for review of the March 6, 2007, order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB), which affirmed the decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) denying Employer’s termination petition. For the reasons that follow, we vacate and remand.

On January 7, 1993, while operating a tug machine in Employer’s warehouse, John Preston (Claimant) stepped in a pothole, twisted his right leg and fell on all fours on a concrete floor. Employer accepted liability for the work injury by way of a Notice of Compensation Payable (NCP)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric Corp./CBS v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Krumins Roofing & Siding v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Samson Paper Co. & Fidelity Engraving v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Ohm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cinram Manufacturing, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Cinram Manufacturing, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API