Legal Opinion

Rupe v. Kemp

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1918No. 14331PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered March 29, 1917, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Prior to April 2, 1915, plaintiff and defendant were partners, and, as such, had contracted with one Knight K. Parker, who had applied for letters patent upon a shock absorber to be used on automobiles, for the manufacture and sale of that article within a certain territory. On April 2, 1915, Kemp disposed of his interest in the partnership and its assets for the agreed price of $1,500. Twenty-five dollars was paid in money and a note executed for $1,475, payable thirty days after date. The parties evidenced their intentions by the writing following:

“April 2, 1915.
“Received of C. M. Rupe, a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davidson Fruit Co. v. Produce Distributors Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Robertson v. ShineWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Gust v. GustWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Thomas v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Yost v. Empire State Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Strickland v. Rainier Golf & Country ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API